🚚 FREE SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.1/5 from 865+ reviews
Beauty βœ“ In Stock πŸ”₯ Bestseller

sol de janeiro rio radiance

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜… 4.1 out of 5 (865 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$13
$21.67
Sale
βœ“ Free shipping on this item β€’ Limited time offer

Sol De Janeiro Rio Radiance SPF 50 Body Lotion Cheirosa 87 Fragrance 100% Mineral Illuminating Sunscreen

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
Fast Shipping
↩️
Easy Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

sol de janeiro rio radiance

Sol De Janeiro Rio Radiance SPF 50 Body Lotion Cheirosa 87 Fragrance 100% Mineral Illuminating Sunscreen

This product is perfect for anyone looking for quality Beauty products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 2055752

Category: Beauty > Skin Care > Sun

Original Price: $21.67 USD

Sale Price: $13 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand New

🚚 Shipping & Returns

βœ“ FREE Shipping on orders over $50

Standard Delivery: 3-5 business days

Express Delivery: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.1
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 6264 reviews
KC
Kayla Campbell βœ“ Verified Purchase
2 months ago Β· Atlanta, GA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Great quality
So far, the sol de janeiro rio radiance works well enough which feels reasonable.
43 people found this helpful
CL
Christopher Lee βœ“ Verified Purchase
4 months ago Β· Charlotte, NC
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Love love love!
No complaints at this price.
21 people found this helpful
JB
Justin Baker βœ“ Verified Purchase
4 months ago Β· Albuquerque, NM
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
Just what I wanted
After some use, the sol de janeiro rio radiance works well enough so no complaints. No setup issues.
7 people found this helpful
HP
Heather Perez βœ“ Verified Purchase
1 month ago Β· Albuquerque, NM
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
Super happy
To be fair, it fits my needs so I’m okay with it.
19 people found this helpful
JW
Jennifer Wilson βœ“ Verified Purchase
1 month ago Β· Houston, TX
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Fantastic product
From my experience, the sol de janeiro rio radiance works fine so it’s acceptable.
37 people found this helpful